People I meet are often intrigued when I say I work in the
world of pharmaceutical marketing. After
all the pharmaceutical industry is extremely regulated. In most parts of the
world, marketing communications are restricted to the healthcare professional
community. Yet, looking at adverts aired in North America, one can easily see what
pharmaceutical brands are all about. A well-known example is certainly that of
Viagra and Cialis.
When Viagra was launched back in 1998, it was the first oral
treatment made available to treat erectile dysfunction. What was most commonly
known, until then, as impotence, was
not at the time perceived as a treatable condition. So Pfizer developed
awareness campaigns, using celebrity endorsement, for example with football
legend Pele or former senator Bob Dole.
As we have seen, initial awareness campaigns focused on relieving
the embarrassment of the condition and encouraged men to go and discuss their
problem with a physician. Coupled with extensive PR coverage, the drug quickly
attained blockbuster sales. Advertising campaigns shifted their focus to depict
happy and victorious men, themes
that would long stay the core of the brand’s identity.
But in 2003, Pfizer was faced with a serious contender, as
Eli Lilly launched Cialis. Conducting pre-launch market research, Lilly’smarketing teams found that a number of women felt pressured by
growing expectations from their husbands taking Viagra. Taking advantage of
tadalafil specific pharmacodynamics, they started promoting the drug as one
that would enable couples to have
(once more) a satisfying sex life.
The difference in focus and tone between the two brands remained for years, whether characters would sing, as in this Viagra ad from 2006:
...or Cialis (2010)
…Or talk about (how much they enjoy what they can do with)
their treatment:
Viagra 2005:
Cialis 2007:
Now dubbed the
Weekender, Cialis became market leader in several European markets such as
France by 2007. While its marketing kept on focusing on the spontaneity couples
could enjoy using the drug, Pfizer’s communications slowly adapted to give a
more prominent role to the Viagra safety profile. First, by reminding the audience which is ‘the most prescribed
E.D. treatment in the U.S.’ (2011):
...and later that ‘you only take it when you need it’ :
More importantly, this advert from 2014 made the headlines
around the world as it was the first time a Viagra ad gave a prominent role to
a woman, thus suggesting a strategic shift in the brand’s communications, now following
the footsteps of its rival in understanding that it is not only men whose lives
change with E.D. treatments.
Direct-to-consumer advertising from these two brands
illustrates a key function of pharmaceutical marketing which is to differentiate
treatments in a crowded marketplace. As in other industries, a deep
understanding of experiences and expectations gives marketers an edge to build
compelling stories. And not unlike other industries, the innovative nature of
the pharmaceutical industry means our understanding also needs to evolve and
strategies need to be adapted over time. Helping our clients to do just that is
what we, at Branding Science, are all passionate about.
The author:
Axel Rousseau is Vice-President of Branding Science in Asia-Pacific. He has
worked on global market research projects for pharmaceutical brands in over 11
countries.
No comments:
Post a Comment